I'm still traumatized by the story. Having one of your hero's say that is devastating to a young artist. Still, one of my teachers Tom Halley told me that in art school though if the teacher didn't like your work they would throw it on the floor and step on it. The point was that they wanted you to learn how to detach from your work. THe point of art being to get to what you want and not get hooked on your failed ideas. Terrifying story Scott with a happy ending.
i loved this its a great story n very insirational x i also love your fab art work i read this story twice thank you for letting me read this i ebjoyed very much xx
I sat next to Neal @ Continuity for years and heard him critique dozens of portfolios including Frank Millers. He was rough on everybody- but, he took the time to go over the work and would often tell people to "come back in a year." The ones that came back (and had improved) got a boost into the biz directly from Neal. And, Jahfurry: Why is it being a douchebag to take up one's precious time to give honest criticism? Most people will tell you "that's nice," but they don't pick up the phone and get you a gig. Neal did that all the time.
I agree, Larry. I don't know why some folks are misinterpreting my tale; I'll always consider Neal's reaction to be a very positive experience, even if it almost overwhelmed me at the time.
I initially had the same type of reaction from Bill Pearson, and it kind of confounded me: because on one hand, Pearson has never really been noted for his own art, but on the other hand, he knew how to get the best from the best as editor of Witzend. It also probably didn't help that the stuff I was showing him was my clumsy, third-rate imitation of Wally Wood. Long story short, I started developing my own style, and less than a year later, Bill published some of my work in a hardcover book along with folks like Dan Adkins, Ronn Sutton, and Michael T. Gilbert, and we'd become friends alomg the way.
Wowch! I don't know how you recovered from that one! I'm so happy that the first pros I met in San Diego were very encouraging: Dan Jippes, Dave Stephens, Mike Grell, Scott Saavedra
I'm so glad you were resilient enough not to take his advice! I was always too easily crushed and I'm afraid I would have been devastated by such a comment.
I agree with jahfurry. Most aspiring cartoonists already get enough discouragement without this kind of "critique." Some are stubborn enough to press on, but others who are just as talented might take such advice at face value, and give up.
I think it's better for a pro to simply critique the amateurs' work, and let them decide for themselves whether it's worth it to press on.
I have to say I completely understand why Adams would say that. If someone is going to get put off by that kind of crit then they really shouldn't be in comics anyway and he's doing them a favor. This business grinds through talent and spits it out, part of being able to survive and even thrive in it is the ability to be brutally honest about your own work. If you know exactly how good/bad you are then nothing Neal Adams is going to say is going to change your mind that much. It might be dispiriting, but the determination to prove him wrong is what you took away from this and that's often all that will pull you through the bad times. So win for you! ...and for us :)
Great story, Scott, well told! I love Kris and the mercurial Neal. One must never forget how much he bravely championed creators' rights to the (temporary but potentially permanent) detriment of his own career in the comics field.
We came from roughly the same generation. Your story and your response to Neal reminds me of the joke (which I find particularly self-descriptive):
Why did the hippie cross the road?
Because someone told him not to.
A more apt ending to this joke (that more directly relates to us and your story) would be:
Because someone told him he couldn't.
PS: And thanks for that new addition to my vocabulary, Jahfurry: "uberdouchey".
I was up at Continuity Associates a few times when Neal looked at the work of aspiring artists. Sometimes as he flipped through the pages he would start making little fart noises with his mouth. I remember when a young artist, who shall go unnamed because he has had a long and successful career in comics, asked Neal to critique a page he had done, of which he was particularly proud, and Neal glanced at it and said, "Could you come back later? It's going to take me about half an hour to tell you everything that's wrong with that page and I just don't have the time right now."
This, in a studio with about half a dozen other artists sitting at their desks and listening in.
Still, as Larry says, Neal was one of the only pros who would let aspiring artists come to his studio and show him their work. If he liked it, he would pick up the phone and get them work immediately. He also helped out a lot of people by giving them work at his studio. He's a great guy and did more for other people than almost anyone I can think of. His brutal honesty is part of the package.
Ive always loved Adams' artwork...and im not here to criticize, but Ive met many talented people with his attitude and I think IT SUCKS! Ive seen people grow much more with some positive feedback and constructive criticism than those laughed at or having fart noises made seemingly mocking their work. I GET IT, I do, teachers do it all the time, but I ALSO get just how much more you can help someone grow by a little positive honesty and direction.
this is a great story and a good example of not giving it up! thank you
Posted by: Jesse Marinoff Reyes 01:00am / Aug 19, 2010
As an art director who has spent a 27-year career in print media—rock magazines, comic books, book cover design—I can assure you the method Neal employs is not evil or negative, it's REAL. The commercial art industry as a whole is a tough business, and not for the hesitant. All the positive feedback in the world will only get you so far—it's the negative feedback that will help you grow, or turn you to a new path or career choice (as sooner or later, you'll need to pay the rent). If you want hearts and flowers from every single critique you are being unrealistic and vain. When I was in magazines people would send me their work all of the time who obviously never took a look at the mag or the calibre (or styles) of the artists who were in it. I'd throw "blind" samples away, and if a portfolio was dropped off I'd tell them to do some research and not waste my time. Was it harsh? Sure, but it was REAL. It isn't an "attitude." You earn your place in the industry and how to work in it. I've broken-in as many new talents in as worked with established ones. Really, really great art talent is a dime a dozen. You have to work hard just to get noticed and it's not for the faint of heart. Sorry. Just the facts.
12:42pm / Aug 15, 2010